Category Archives: Blog


Prices for things like homes, education, and childcare have advanced well beyond what’s affordable on a median income, leaving them behind previous generations in achieving several common American milestones.

Why are they struggling to match the success of their parents? Why are they saddled with financial burdens that appear to be outsized compared to their incomes? What happened, and what can be done?

At the moment, millennials are getting their answers from the Democratic presidential hopefuls. And they’re telling young voters that the economy is currently skewed toward those who already have assets. Recent tax reforms benefits corporations and older generations. The only way to fix the inequities in the current system is to forcibly take more assets from those who possess them through taxation and redistribute them through social programs. It’s simply a matter of identifying those who will pay more while directing the benefits to those who are best served.

This is the messaging you’re hearing from nearly all of them: Warren, Harris, Booker, Bernie, Buttigieg, Beto…even de Blasio. It’s a message that probably doesn’t resonate with many people over 50, but that’s the point. We’re the generations that were able to cobble together small but growing incomes to gather the markers of successful lives. We had car loans, home loans, and some of us even had student loans, but they were within reason given our income. As more women went to work, we put our young children in daycare and paid for after-school care, but again, the cost was well worth the benefit of the extra income from the second earner. While the message may not resonate with us, there’s no question that we will be the ones required to pay.

It’s too early to tell if Trump will be re-elected in 2020, or if the Republicans will retain their majority in the Senate. It’s likely that at least one of those two things will happen, which will slow the progress of the redistribution machine. But 2022 and 2024 aren’t that far away. As time goes on, younger voters will continue to gain more clout on the electoral maps. And by then, we’re likely to have suffered the next recession, which will only make things worse.

We need to pay attention to what the younger generation is demanding—and expecting—from the government, because it will directly affect our bank accounts and investments. From healthcare to childcare, there are several areas of life where we are likely to provide significant support, transferring assets from older to younger generations. The programs will be big, transformative, and expensive. Looking at some of the proposals from current Democratic candidates, we can get a sense of what will happen down the road.

The recurring theme in all of this is simple: Hang on to your wallet!

Young Americans Lagging Behind

The Census Bureau shows that the rate of homeownership in younger groups remains well below the long run average, even though the homeownership rate among older groups has recovered to pre-financial crisis levels. Just under 60% of Americans 35 to 44 years old own a home, whereas the national average rate of homeownership is about 65%. Thirty-six percent of those under 35 own homes, compared to the long run average of 40% for this age group. These numbers started falling during the financial crisis, bottomed in 2015, recovered a bit for two years, then went sideways in 2018.

The reason for falling homeownership is obvious: money…or rather, a lack of it.

Immediately after the financial crisis, lenders were strict in requiring large down payments. Even though housing programs have relaxed and now will offer loans with near zero down for first-time buyers, prices have run up so fast as to put the prospect of homeownership out of reach.

As for children, the U.S. birthrate just touched an historic low. The United States needs 2.1 children per woman of child-bearing age to keep the population steady, replacing each parent plus a bit for mortality and those who don’t have kids. In 2018, the birthrate fell to 1.72.

The numbers weren’t consistent across all ages. Teenage births dropped dramatically over the past decade, which is good. But births to women in their twenties were down overall, while births to moms in their early thirties were flat, and those to moms over 35 ticked higher.

The reasons for not having children, or even starting later in life than previous generations, are easy to find. The New York Times surveyed 1,858 young adults, ages 18 to 45, last year, asking why they aren’t having their ideal number of children. The respondents could list multiple reasons. The top five responses were:

• Cost of childcare: 64%
• Not enough time: 54%
• Economic concerns: 49%
• Can’t afford more children: 44%
• Financial instability: 43%

Again, the issue is about money…but Millennials are also finding themselves preoccupied during peak child-producing years by continuing efforts in education. That’ll become even more so the case for the members of Generation Z, who are attaining levels of education well beyond what the Boomers and Generation X achieved. The rate of high school graduation—not GED, but actual graduation—has increased from less than 80% in the 2000s to 85% today. College graduation rates have remained steady at about 68% of those who enroll, but a larger percentage of the younger generations are giving college…the old college try. Almost 40% of Millennials and Gen Zers earn a college degree, which is slowly dragging the overall rate of college grads in the population higher.

Of course, all this schooling comes with a financial cost. Tuition has long outpaced income, and now student loan debt is far more common. Americans carry more than $1.5 trillion in student loan debt, and the burden is generational. Forty percent of people under 30 carry such debt, while only 20% of those over 30 days they have any.

Among those graduating college, 70% will enter the workforce already owing money, and many others who tried college but didn’t graduate will also run into debt. The scary number being thrown around is that the average student loan det is about $38,000, but that number skews toward those who get post-graduate degrees, most of whom go on to careers that give them an income sufficient to pay their loans and still meet their goals.

The real issue lies with the typical undergrad, or even those who never graduate.

According to the Pew Research Center, students who earn a bachelor’s degree and take on student loans leave college with a median balance of $25,000. It’s not the eye-popping average of $38,000, but it’s not chump change, either. It’s a car you can’t drive, or a down payment on a home you can’t afford. Think about how long it took you to save your first $25,000.

For those who try college but don’t graduate, the median loan balance is $10,000. A lot less than the average, but remember, this is for people who don’t get the benefit of the degree.
And it’s not just that costs are shooting higher; they’re also increasing at a much faster pace than income, either putting milestones out of reach or saddling newly minted adults with prohibitive costs.

With a chasm opening between the younger generations and their financial goals, it’s no surprise to see them migrating toward a political camp that promises to address social inequities, and to do it with other people’s money.

The Growing Slant on the Young Voter

Over the past dozen years, male and female voters from each generation have zigged and zagged politically, with some getting more conservative and others becoming more liberal. The differences range from minuscule to moderate, except for those of one group: Millennial women.

As Pew Research charts show, this influential group has moved dramatically to one side of the voting booth.

From 2002 through 2017, conservatives gained ground among three groups: both men and women in the Silent Generation, and Millennial men. But the gain of any group that stands out is for Democrats among Millennial women, jumping from 54% to 70%. Because of their numbers, that transition more than offsets the growing conservative tendencies of the Silent Generation in past elections, and it’s set to seriously tilt the scales in elections to come.

In the 2018 mid-term elections, more voters under 50 turned out at the polls than voters over 50, the first time that’s happened since at least the 1970s.

By 2020, 23% of the electorate will be over 65 years old, but the boomers and older generations will be just 40% of voters, down from 70% in 2000.

As more young, educated, financially strained voters go to the polls, they will be looking for answers to their economic ills, and they will find them in the plans promoted by candidates like Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

They will vote for the social programs, but older, outnumbered voters will pay for them.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blog


The Best Movies of 2019
Every year, my first blog in the New Year has been the movies I enjoyed the most in the previous year.

This year I’ve only had four so I couldn’t devote a whole blog to the subject; usually we have eight or 10 movies. Movies for adults are getting scarce; oh well, less support I’ll give to Hollywood.

Official Secrets is the story of Katherine Gun (Keira Knightly), a Brit intelligence specialist who handles routine classified info and comes across a memo from the NSA (US) asking the Brits to join the US in collecting compromising info on UN Secretary Council members in order to blackmail them in favor of an invasion of Iraq.

Feeling this was an unjust war, she leaks this memo to activist anti-war journalist. She confesses to the authorities. The article creates quite a stir and is defended by Ralph Fiennes in an outstanding performance.

It’s a good flic!

Fast & Furious is a fast-paced, remarkable, true story of the visionary car designer Carol Shelby (Matt Damon) and the fearless Brit car driver Ken Miles (Christian Bale) who together bottled corporate interference, the laws of physics and their own personal demons to build a revolutionary race car for the Ford Motor Company and take on the dominating race cars of Enzo Ferrari at the 24 hours of Le Mans in 1966.

Dark Waters, inspired by a true story, a tenacious attorney, Mark Ruffalo, uncovers a dark secret that connects a growing number of unexplained deaths caused by one of the world’s largest corporations. In the process, he risks everything—his future, his family and his own life to explore the truth.

Well done!

The Farewell. The film follows a Chinese family who, when they discover their beloved grandmother has only a short while left to live, decide to keep her in the dark and schedule an impromptu wedding to gather before she passes. Billi, feeling like a fish out of water in her home county, struggles with the family’s decision to hide the truth from her grandmother.

Terrific on all accounts!

Hope 2020 will be better for adult movies


Iran Drone Strike Signals Significant Escalation in Mideast Tensions

President Trump says he ordered the drone strike that killed Iran’s top military leader, General Qassem Soleimani, top planner of Iran’s misdeeds in the Middle East, to avoid a war.
Trump’s action, apparently supported by his military advisors, will raise the level of intercourse between the US and Iran. No one is sure how that will evolve.

Soleimani’s influence has already begun to fade but Iran will try to make the most of it.


Americans waited two years for the Mueller report, then they couldn’t agree on what it said.

Trips I Didn’t Get To Take

If you’ve been following our blogs, you know we’ve traveled quite a bit. Gabriele and I have been in over 80 small countries and in seven continents.
Because of some health and physical issues, my traveling days are over.

Here’s the list of places I still wanted to travel to:

• Suez Canal
• Israel (Return)
• Jordan (Petra)
• Turkey (expanded)
• Nepal
• Britain
• Tibet
• Northern Lights
• Northwest Passage
• New Guinea
• Montevideo, Uruguay
• Madagascar
• N.E. Canada


The political left has gone to great lengths to force corporations to defund conservative and libertarian organizations and we’ve responded in kind.

Six corporations—Ford, ConocoPhillips, John Deere, GM, BP and Caterpillar—withdrew from the U.S. Climate Partnership, a corporate-green alliance pushing climate change regulations, after we convinced them that we’d make their continued membership controversial and costly for them.

John Deere & Company withdrew its membership for USCAP immediately after we launched a month-long advertising campaign on local television over its membership.

Stories about the ads appeared in its local press, including the Des Moines Register, Quad-City Times, and Dubuque Telegraph Herald, and also in the national media.

This negative press coverage was sufficient to force Deere to cry uncle.

Caterpillar dropped its membership after we recruited major Caterpillar customers to vow to stop purchasing the company’s products unless it stopped supporting cap-and-trade and funding USCAP.

The six withdrawals from USCAP were very significant. They meant that the group lost $600,000 in fees EVERY YEAR. The blow was so severe that soon after USCAP closed.


So how did all this press corruption happen?

In 1983, 50 companies controlled 90 percent of the American media. Today, six conglomerates control the same 90 percent. They are National Amusements (CBS, MTV, BET, on and on), Disney (ABC, ESPN, Marvel, on and one), TimeWarner (CNN, HBO, TBS, on and on), Comcast (NBC, Dreamworks, Universal, on and on), 21 Century Newscorp (Fox, NatGeo, FX, on and on) and Sony.


Don’t think outside the box…think like there is no box.

Death leaves a heart ache no one can heal.
Love leaves a memory no one can steal.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blog


As we approach the beginning of a New Year, I am reminded of the good deeds performed by anonymous people on my behalf during the last year. It reinforces for me the kindness and generosity of people who have taken the time and initiative to help me.

I only remember their deeds, not their names. They came into my life for a few minutes, helped me out of a jam and moved on to fulfill their own needs.

Just a few weeks ago I was riding my 4-wheel electric scooter from physical therapy anxious to get home for lunch.

About a half-mile from home my scooter died. It was fully charged but that didn’t stop it. Trying to alternately push the 175-lb machine and move forward when the power engaged briefly was a task.

From men and women at various points in the tedious journey, recognized my plight, stopped their cars and asked if they could help…and help they did.

It was a great gesture of needed assistance in a time of real need. The 12-minute trip took over 45 minutes but boy was I relieved and grateful.

It reminded me of a time a few years back when I moved into my current condo and the elderly couple I sold my condo to called to ask if I left some money in the desk I gave them with their unit.

Both episodes convinced me of how humanity exists in this overburdened world and how much we need to celebrate this humanity.

So let’s say a fond adieu to the joys and good feelings about 2019 and welcome the New Year with great expectation and humanity.

Happy New Year

H appiness depends upon your outlook on life. Find the good in all situations.
A ttitude is just as important as ability. Keep your attitude positive.
P assion, find yours this year! Do what you love and you will never work.
P ositive thoughts make everything easier. Stay focused and stay positive.
Y ou are unique, with special gifts, use them. Never forget you have talent.

N ew beginnings with a new year.
E nthusiasm, a true secret of success.
W ishes, may they turn into goals.

Y ears go by too quickly, enjoy them. Wisdom from your elders, listen.
E nergy, may you have lots of it. Take care of yourself.
A ppreciation of life, don’t take it for granted. Live each day.
R elax, take the time to relax in this coming year. Keep a balance in your life.



Filed under Blog


I’m not a Republican or a Democrat, I’m an Independent albeit probably a conservative Independent. I have a problem identifying with the orthodoxy or either party.

The Democrats are turning more toward social programs funded by the government and I’m not at all sure where the Republicans are turning.

In 2019, I changed my mind about a few things:

1. I no longer support doing away with the Electoral College. The popular vote allows too much influence for the big major cities—once again the founding fathers were right.
2. I firmly believe in climate change, I just am not sure how much is contributed by men nor am I confident all the large countries will do their part in making necessary changes.
3. The concept of “privacy” has been exaggerated to an extreme which has worked against the majority of law-abiding citizens.
4. I recognize some of the failings of capitalism but it is still the greatest and best economic system in the world and has helped more people advance than any other system.


I’m going to count to 3—the frustrated call of all parents trying to raise a mischievous kid. I’m going to count to 3 and you better… It’s really an age-old cry for help. I’m going to count to 3 and you better stop doing that, better come home, better eat your…

With all our technology, you’d think we’d have found a better way.


Ranking U.S. Companies by the Priorities of Americans

Just Capital and Forbes have rated U.S. firms based on factors that matter most to the American public, like fair pay, ethical leadership, customer privacy, environmental impact and job creation.

Here are the top most “just” U.S. companies according to their analysis: Microsoft, Apple, Intel, Salesforce, Alphabet, PayPal and P&G.

Microsoft’s top spot is a result of its “particularly strong track record on how it serves its workers, communities, and the environment,” according to Just Capital.

Compared with averages for the Russell 1000, the 100 companies in the listing pay their median workers 31 percent more, give 8.4 times as much to charitable causes, have 25 percent more women on their board, and are 32 percent more likely to have established environmental policies. They also score a higher return on equity, by six percentage points.


A Social Civil War is in Progress

A new poll says 70 percent of Americans believe we are on the verge of civil war. They are wrong. There’s no verge. A social civil war is in progress.

Two primary reasons why: Never before was it acceptable to call your country racist or to demand taxpayers pick up the tab for the health care expenses of illegal aliens.


How accurate is the Horowitz Report?

Last week, the Inspector General of the Justice Department, Michael Horowitz, issued a more than 400-page, long-delayed report written over an eight-month period. In this report, Horowitz basically said just two things: first, that the FBI was dishonest in seeking surveillance warrants on the Trump campaign; and, second, that no political bias was in play.

Upon hearing that, fair-minded people all over the country said…really?

So Michael Horowitz is convinced that the most sophisticated law enforcement agency in the world is incapable of properly requesting a tap on a presidential campaign, perhaps the most important investigation the FBI has had since the 9-11 attack.

This is incredibly hard to believe and Horowitz’s boss, Attorney General William Barr, does not believe it either.

He essentially told the nation that Michael Horowitz is full of it and hinted that criminal indictments against some FBI people will be forthcoming.

I guess it takes longer to write a whitewash than straight facts.


If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.


Impeachment is as distant as world peace.

To Satisfy our Future:

• We have to stop sanctuary cities and open borders. They both lead to anarchy.
• Everyone should have a photo ID card to vote.
• The House of Representatives should have 4-year terms and be limited to 4 years.
• Raise the cap on Social Security tax to $250,000 along with the median age to 70.

So, all in all, what kind of year was it?

The economy remained strong and the increasing talk of a possible downturn or recession got tabled. Trump’s trade wars didn’t hurt the storekeepers all that much; on the contrary, his trade wars seem to be having some success.

The Democrats, in desperation, elected a few nutty reps and are trying to turn the party to the social domestic agenda of Western Europe, in spite of their lack of success, and have focused all their attention and energy on responsible governing and fighting Trump with endless investigations instead of countering his annoying behavior with programs that will defeat his re-election.

If Trump would shut his annoying mouth, he would have had a pretty good year. Nobody likes him except at least half the country.

• The economy is strong
• Unemployment is way down and employment is way up
• His aggressive trade negotiations are beginning to work
• He has appointed a record number of judges
• He’s survived an endless stream of investigations

With the stock market jumping up and down, the craziness of the politics in both parties, and the general sanguine in the country, it was a pretty good year.


Filed under Blog


Do you find yourself running in place at the end of the day to get the step count on your activity tracker up to 10,000? While gratifying to hit your goal, you’ll be glad to know that many steps may not be necessary. Results of a recent study on fitness show you can cut that number by more than half and still achieve positive health results. Of course, you can still strive towards your personal goals, but don’t stress if you don’t reach that magical number on your Fitbit every day.

There is no scientific basis that 10,000 steps are the ultimate goal for maximum impact on your heart health. The number stems from a Japanese marketing campaign for a pedometer, not solid scientific evidence, according to the study.

U.S. Fitness Guidelines recommend you get a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise a week to gain maximum benefits. Walking is an excellent way to increase your activity level—even if it’s just doing a couple of extra laps around the yard when you take out the trash. It all counts.

Small amounts of walking—as little as five or 10 minutes at a time—done regularly throughout your day provides positive results. Every step you take counts towards your goal but some steps are more beneficial than others.

A leisurely stroll is fine, but a brisk walk is even better when it comes to improving your heart health. If you’re counting steps, 80 steps a minute is considered a slow pace; 100 steps a minute indicates a pace that’s brisk to moderate; and a fast pace is 120 steps a minute, according to Harvard Health.

Once you’re up and moving, how many steps do you really need? According to the study, the number is less than you may expect.

Researchers looked at a group of nearly 17,000 women with an average age of 72. The women all wore trackers to count their steps and the pace of their activity as they went about their usual day. Participants were divided into groups based on the average number of steps they reports: 2,700, 4,400, 5,900, and 8,500. During the 4.3-year follow up period, here’s what researchers found:

• The women with the least amount of activity averaged about 2,700 steps a day. They were found to have the highest risk of death.
• Women who completed 4,400 steps a day were around 40 percent less likely to die during the follow-up period than the women walking 2,700 steps or less a day.
• Risk of dying for women in the 5,900-step group fell by 46 percent compared to the less active participants.
• Women in the 8,500-step group experienced 58 percent lower risk of dying but that benefit seemed to taper off at an average 7,500 steps a day. There was no added longevity when extra additional steps were completed.
• The intensity level and speed of the steps had no effect on the results. Slow, steady walking offered similar results to a more aggressive pace.

What do the results mean?

Despite the lower steps needed to gain results, researchers stress that the study’s results are not justification to do less. Regular physical activity reduces the risk of heart disease and improves brain function as well as circulation, weight control and blood pressure.

However, for women who struggle with adding exercise to their day, the study shows that their journey to improved health may take fewer steps to complete than they originally thought. And that’s good news for everyone.

Find a doctor

Whether you’re just beginning to add steps to your day or regularly maxing out your pedometer, the team of experts at your local hospital can help you reach your heart-health goals safely. If you are looking for a primary care doctor, you can search for one that’s right for you from a local hospital. Or you can find one using a regional directory.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blog


Adeel Hassan of the N.Y. Times reported on an interview with a Middle East journalist who explains how the biggest migration in human history is helping to fuel the erosion of American cultural dominance.

“The Bold and the Beautiful,” a staple of American daytime television for more than 30 years, peaked in its worldwide viewership at 26.2 million in 2008. A few years later, “Magnificent Century,” a Turkish drama, was broadcast to 200 million people. That wide gulf in audience is one of the focuses of the book “New Kings of the World,” about how American soft power is being eclipsed around the globe.

The author, Fatima Bhutto, was born in Kabul, Afghanistan, raised in Damascus, Syria, and educated in New York and London. She now works as a novelist and journalist in Karachi, Pakistan. Ms. Bhutto racked up tens of thousands of frequent-flier miles while exploring popular culture emerging from the East.
During a recent visit to the New York Times newsroom, she gave us a different perspective on race and culture. These are edited excerpts from the conversation.

Share with us what tour cultural diet was like.

Growing up in Damascus in the 1980s, my father would get James Bond films on VHS, we’d have Motown music playing in the car, and I’d watch half an hour of nonverbal cartoons that state TV would show in the evenings.

I am very much a child of American culture but at the same time, I also had access to plenty of non-American culture products. As a teenager in Pakistan, I listened to Snoop Dogg and American hip-hop, but also to the Pakistani bands Junoon and Strings, as well as Rai music from Algeria and Egyptian pop.

American culture was always the glitziest, but it wasn’t always the most thoughtful.

The lure of American soft power—Coca-Cola, jazz, jeans, rock ‘n’ roll and, of course, Hollywood—has historically been strong and backed by the government. How did American military supremacy help export this cultural power?

The American military is the most widely deployed in history, and it maintains a massive infrastructure outside its borders with bases across all continents and an enormous machinery to support its presence.

At its height, in 1968, more than one million American troops were deployed in 54 countries. They brought their cultures with them, their films, their music, their tastes and their products. And they also were a huge presence that required entertainment, so they became places where musicians and artists would find welcome ground.

Today, just under 20,000 personnel are overseas, marking the lowest American troop deployment in six decades. One might argue that as troop numbers decrease, so too does American culture dominance.

When did the pivot away from Hollywood begin to occur? Why was there a backlash?

There isn’t one moment we can point to, rather it’s a perfect storm of factors including plummeting American prestige, the belated rediscovery that local cultures are valuable in and of themselves, and the rise of classes with different tastes and backgrounds emerging out of the turbulence of globalization, migration and urbanization.

Describe the effect of those trends.

In 2015, over one billion people left their homes in search of a better life. Only a small percentage, 244 million, migrated abroad. The majority, some 763 million, moved from rural to urban areas within their own countries. Between 1.5 million and 3 million people move to cities every week. The psychological disorientation caused by these shifts is profound.

People leaving their families and villages are unmoored in the big, soulless city. It is a geography without anchors, full of sexual and material deprivations, injustices and inequalities. Add to that the betrayal of globalization’s promise: that the world would be lifted on a tide of wealth, opportunity and access.

But hundreds of millions of people who uprooted their life in order to become captains of this new world have found no wealth, no opportunity and no access. Rather, the opposite.

How does Hollywood speak to the world’s unmoored and displaced? What does “Hustlers” say to a woman who has left her family’s village in El Salvador to move to the turbulent, violent city? What does “Avengers: Endgame” say to Afghan refugees, fighting to survive, in this new world? Nothing. It doesn’t speak to them at all.

What makes an Indian film, a Turkish television drama or a Korean pop song have more universal appeal than a piece of American work?

They look modern and appealing in the same way that American film, TV or music looks. But uniquely, these are all cultural products set firmly in the realm of values. They are not concerned with which billionaire son inherits his father’s empire, but rather focus on ordinary people struggling to live lives of dignity with the force of the world against them.

They are concerned with principles, with how one defeats temptation, greed, and avoids dishonor. So for the most part, there is less violence; there’s no nudity; romantic relations are portrayed very chastely; and there’s no swearing.

You can listen to a K-pop song with your grandmother in the room, no lyrics have to be beeped out. You can watch a Turkish drama, or dizi as they’re called, with your entire family.

Are all these cultural movements tied to their government and plays at soft power as well?

These industries have been producing culture for decades and, yes, they are all weapons of soft power, some more than others. K-pop is born out of the 1997 Asian financial crisis. South Korea was badly hit, and couldn’t rebuild their economy by relying on the heavy industries of Samsung and Hyundai as they had done in the past. President Kim Dae-jung decided to focus on pop culture. It required no organizational infrastructure—only talent, time, and training.

K-pop is a $5 billion-dollar-a-year industry. In 2016, K-pop music videos were watched 24 billion times on YouTube, with 80 percent of the views coming from outside South Korea. In YouTube’s top ten list of videos with the largest number of views in 24 hours, six belong to K-pop bands. YouTube didn’t even know videos could be watched over one billion times until Psy’s “Gangman Style” famously broke their counter.

What is the glocalization you write about?

“Glocalization” is the ultimate bait and switch. It’s the secret sauce of K-pop, which relies on taking established Western pop music and tempos and then “localizing” it by speeding it up. That elevated speed is what makes K-pop music do dance-y and so infectious. K-pop is an industry with its eye finely tuned to the market. It’s not concerned with authenticity. But what it does is take an established pop formula and do something frantic and innovative with it that is distinctly Korean.

You went to see where all this culture was produced, and also where it was consumed around the world. What are the most surprising places these movements have conquered?

By far, the most surprising discovery was to find an entire subculture of Bollywood fans in Peru. They are all indigenous Peruvians, people who migrated into Lima from the highlands, and they don’t speak English but know all the Hindu/Urbu lyrics to Bollywood songs and are immersed in the culture of the films.

Campo de Marte is a park in downtown Lima that is filled with people every Sunday dancing to Bollywood music. Women turn shawls into saris and stick sequins on their foreheads as bindis. It’s a cinema that makes them feel seen; they see their struggles and their dreams mirrored in the story lines.

You’ve spent hundreds of hours on “research.” Give those of us who know little about these genres your best recommendations.

It’d had to say “Cukur” is definitely the dizi to watch; it’s “The Godfather,” but set in an Istanbul ghetto. “Gully Boy” is the best Bollywood film I’ve seen in years because it recalls the best of old Bollywood—turning the gaze to those on the periphery of society. I have a K-pop playlist of top hits I created, which I’m happy to share but probably shouldn’t.

Leave a comment

Filed under Blog


Today’s blog is a letter I received from Lovena Lee, Chairperson of The Southwest Reservation Aid organization

Dear Mr. Schwartz:

You and I may have a different understanding of particular events in America’s history. You see, I’m a member of the Diné—or “The People”—what you may call the Navajo tribe of Native Americans.

I grew up in the Sweetwater area of the Navajo Reservation in Arizona, but my ancestors came to what is now the United States over a thousand years ago. At an early age, I learned our Navajo traditions, culture and history as told in stories passed from one generation to the next.

As a teenager, I left the reservation to attend boarding school and then college. There, not everyone shared my thoughts on how historical events—particularly those surrounding America’s western expansion—created the framework for the prejudice, poverty and despair Native Americans continue to endure today.
3-Minute American History Quiz

The “3-Minute American History Quiz” illustrates how policies made over 185 years ago still affect the everyday lives of Native Americans.

Question 1: Why did the United States government establish Indian reservations?

Answer: The government’s objective was to rid the country of its “Indian problem” and open land for white settlers.

Beginning in 1830 with the Indian Removal Act, the official policy of the United States was to forcibly remove Native Americans from their ancestral lands and relocate us to far-away regions “reserved” for Indians. For the Cherokee and other tribes, this is often remembered as the “Trail of Tears.” But it didn’t end there. During the Navajo Long Walk beginning in 1863, thousands of Navajo were also removed from their homelands.

Question 2: How did the government decide where to locate the reservations?

Answer: Typically, the government put reservations in areas it regarded as being unfit for white settlers—isolated and arid places unsuitable for agriculture and far from towns, transportation and the growing economy.

However, as the nation’s population expanded westward, the government took back most of these lands and forced Native Americans to relocate again—this time to even less-desirable lands. Today, the land reserved for Native Americans has shrunk to just 2.3 percent of the land originally promised.

Question 3: If I were to visit, what should I expect to see on an Indian reservation today?

Answer: You would see a proud people—strong in tradition and values—living in near third-world conditions. Poverty is extreme. Drive around the reservation and you’ll see many people living in run down houses and trailers, many of which are without electricity, telephone, running water or a sewage system.

Today, Native Americans are the poorest population in the entire Northern Hemisphere.

Question 4: How can these conditions exist in the richest and most powerful country in the world?

Answer: Between 35-85% of the Native Americans who live on the reservations are unemployed. To find work, many must most away from the reservation and leave their families behind. (Many children living on reservations are being raised by their grandparents.)

Even the most basic services—healthcare, stores and schools—are often an hour or more away and families are forced to choose between using the little money they have to buy gasoline for the car or food for the children.

Question 5: What is being done to resolve the problem?

Answer: Thankfully, the Southwest Reservation Aid (SWRA) program is helping us build strong, self-sufficient Native American communities. But we recognize that it is unrealistic to expect anyone to focus on building a stronger community—much less return to the reservation—unless they know there will be food for their family. Accordingly, SWRA’s most urgent goal is to get food to the people on the reservations who need it most.

To fulfill this need, the SWRA program is distributing staples such as beans, rice, flour, soup and canned goods to Navajo, Hopi, Zuni, Apache and other reservations. Last year along, SWRA provided enough food for over 22,000 meals for Native American Elders, families and children.

Question 6: How can I help?

Answer: The most urgent need is for food. Today, one in four Native Americans who live on reservations don’t have enough to eat—or know where their next meal will come from. Feeding people is SWRA’s number one priority but we need your help to do it.

You can help with a tax-deductible contribution which will help us buy rice, vegetables, beans, cheese, oatmeal, potatoes and the other foods that people on the reservations need to survive.

Remarkably, SWRA can provide a full serving of food for only 11 cents! This means we can feed 910 Native Americans—who would otherwise not have anything to eat—for only $100. With just $150, we can feed 1,364 people.

Thank you!


Lovena B. Lee, Chairperson

You can support the Southwest Reservation Aid program by sending a check to: 1310 East Riverside Drive, Phoenix, Arizona 85034.

A Joyous and Happy Thanksgiving for all!

Leave a comment

Filed under Blog